It’s no secret that young people in America and elsewhere in the first world are getting lonelier and lonelier. The term “loneliness epidemic” has become so common that it’s now a bit of a cliche.
The reasons we’ve been struck by this epidemic are many and varied. It’s far too simplistic to say that young people are lonelier because they read less. However, I do feel that this is one of the reasons that people are so lonely.
Going Numb
Instead of spending time with other people or reading, most citizens of the first world under the age of 40 now spend every moment of their free time distracting themselves from their loneliness with various forms of Internet-based entertainment. This not only doesn’t treat the root cause of the problem, it doesn’t even really treat the symptom.
Watching TikTok videos and the like is a treatment for loneliness in the same way that lidocaine is a treatment for a third-degree burn. It only provides a moment’s relief, the symptom is still there, just a bit further away, and you need more and more and more to get by.
The most commonly prescribed treatment for loneliness is to spend time with other humans — in-person. While this is certainly part of a healthy treatment regimen, it’s inadequate by itself.
The Two Types Of Loneliness
There are two types of loneliness. Surface-level loneliness and existential loneliness. Spending time with other humans can only treat surface-level loneliness. No matter how much time you spend with other people, however, it won’t treat your existential loneliness. You’ll still be alone within your own consciousness. In fact, spending time with the wrong people—those who quite obviously see the world very differently—can actually make existential loneliness worse.
Existential loneliness, from which surface-level loneliness metastasizes, is far harder to treat and perhaps impossible to cure. In fact, there’s no treatment for it in the physical world, nor is such a treatment even possible.
The Only Treatment
The only possible treatment for existential loneliness is to share your consciousness with someone. But this is impossible in the “real” world, and by extension impossible in nonfiction books anchored in the real world.
Reading fiction is the only way you can share your consciousness with someone and overcome existential loneliness. Fiction puts the character’s consciousness on the page, which becomes your consciousness when you read the book and its words become your thoughts. For this to happen, you need to open your mind to an alternate reality in which sharing consciousnesses is possible — which is what readers are doing when they dive into a work of fiction.
The Shortcomings Of Nonfiction
Nonfiction, like bad fiction, is written for an audience to understand. It’s the paper equivalent of a speech or campfire story by the author. This means that the author’s thoughts are translated into the words they think will get across the necessary information as clearly and forcefully as possible. To make it sound a bit less intellectual — nonfiction comes from the mouth, while fiction comes from the heart.
Of course, fiction can include such overt and clearly stated messages from the author. This, put simply, is the definition of pretentiousness. Pretentiousness is so detested by literary readers, myself included, because it shatters the fictional world by making the work feel like a lecture.
Attempts to Bridge the Gap
Creative nonfiction attempts to find a solution to these shortcomings through the use of fictional devices. But is creative nonfiction really nonfiction?
Take literary journalism, for example. If the author is acting in ways they wouldn’t have otherwise because they want to create a good story or they’re making up the thoughts of real-life characters… well, that certainly sounds like the creation of fictional stories to me.
The Prognosis
It certainly doesn’t seem like people will start putting down their smartphones and picking up literature en masse. Realistically, there’s no reason to believe that the dual trends of increased screen time and reducing reading time will do anything but accelerate. However, there will always be readers because literature will always offer something that can’t be found anywhere else.
A Sacred Calling
If there will always be readers, there always needs to be books to treat them. There are a finite number of great books in the world. An avid reader could get through them in a couple of years. What would they do then, without more books entering the world, books that offer the possibility of escaping the deadliest strain of loneliness?
This is the best reason I can find to keep writing in an era where literature doesn’t even have a place in mainstream American culture. If I can help just one reader feel less alone, the drudgery and pain of writing fiction is not for naught. This is a purpose every fiction writer can fall back on.
You must be logged in to post a comment.